Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetLink
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-12 02:06:52
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (926)
Related
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Kentucky Derby's legendary races never get old: seven to watch again and again
- Powell likely to signal that lower inflation is needed before Fed would cut rates
- Employer of visiting nurse who was killed didn’t protect her and should be fined, safety agency says
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- ‘A step back in time': America’s Catholic Church sees an immense shift toward the old ways
- What is May Day? How to celebrate the spring holiday with pagan origins
- 9-year-old's heroic act saves parents after Oklahoma tornado: Please don't die, I will be back
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Jason Kelce Details Why Potential Next Career Move Serves as the Right Fit
Ranking
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Jeff Daniels loads up for loathing in 'A Man in Full' with big bluster, Georgia accent
- Air Pollution Could Potentially Exacerbate Menopause Symptoms, Study Says
- 32 Mother’s Day Gift Ideas Under $10 That Your Mom Will Actually Use
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Why Sofía Vergara Felt Empowered Sharing Truth Behind Joe Manganiello Split
- The Daily Money: Will the Fed make a move?
- Los Angeles train crashes with USC shuttle bus, injuring 55; 2 people critical
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
In Season 3 of 'Hacks,' Jean Smart will make you love to laugh again: Review
Ryan Gosling Is Unrecognizable in Latest Red Carpet Look at The Fall Guy Premiere
Mega Millions winning numbers for April 30 drawing: Jackpot rises to $284 million
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
The Book Report: Washington Post critic Ron Charles (April 28)
'The Fall Guy' review: Ryan Gosling brings his A game as a lovestruck stuntman
Number of searches on Americans in FBI foreign intelligence database fell in 2023, report shows